美国NovaBios埃博拉病毒抗原检测试剂盒
广州健仑生物科技有限公司
本司长期供应埃博拉病毒检测试剂盒,其主要品牌包括美国NovaBios、广州创仑等CDC使用的进口产品,试剂盒的实验方法包括胶体金方法、ELISA方法、PCR方法等。
欢迎咨询
欢迎咨询2042552662
埃博拉病毒IgM、IgG、ELISA检测试剂、埃博拉快速检测试剂盒、
埃博拉病毒核酸检测试剂盒(荧光探针PCR)
西非工作、旅游埃博拉检测试剂盒
美国CDC使用的埃博拉诊断试剂——美国的NovaBios
美国NovaBios 埃博拉病毒抗原检测试剂盒
【埃博拉简介】
埃博拉(Ebola virus)又译作伊波拉病毒。是一种十分罕见的病毒,1976年在苏丹南部和刚果(金)(旧称扎伊尔)的埃博拉河地区发现它的存在后,引起医学界的广泛关注和重视,“埃博拉”由此而得名。是一个用来称呼一群属于纤维病毒科埃博拉病毒属下数种病毒的通用术语。是一种能引起人类和灵长类动物产生埃博拉出血热的烈性传染病病毒,有很高的死亡率,在50%至90%之间,致死原因主要为中风、心肌梗塞、低血容量休克或多发性器官衰竭。
埃博拉出血热(EBHF)是由一种丝状病毒感染导致的急性出血性、动物源性传染病。1976年,埃博拉出血热在非洲的苏丹和扎伊尔暴发,病死率高达50% ~ 90% 。因该病始发于扎伊尔北部的埃博拉河流,并在该区域严重流行,故命名为埃博拉病毒,其形态学、致病性等与马尔堡病毒相似,但免疫原性有所区别。
【产品介绍】
该产品是世界卫生组织(WHO)*个批准用于埃博拉病毒检测的诊断试剂卡。不需要借助其他实验仪器设备,只需要采取几滴血清、血浆、血液样品,既可以检测,并在15分钟内就可以得知结果是否感染埃博拉病毒。该产品具有灵敏度高、操作方便、实验时间短等特点。
埃博拉病毒快速诊断试剂卡 | |
实验方法 | 胶体金法 |
实验样本 | 血清/血浆/全血/唾液 |
灵敏度 | 92% |
特异性 | 99% |
储存条件 | 4~30℃ |
保质期 | 12个月 |
实验时间 | 15分钟 |
美国NovaBios
为改善公众对埃博拉病毒病(埃博拉病毒)的知识,态度和做法(KAP)的卫生宣传和社会动员工作对于控制几内亚的2 0 1 4年埃博拉病毒疫情至关重要(1),导致3,814例埃博拉病例报告2,544人死亡*几内亚大多数埃博拉病毒是由于艾滋病病毒感染艾滋病病毒和尸体的洗涤和触摸,而在家里,葬礼和卫生设施中没有适当的感染控制预防措施(2,3)。由于2015年8月18个月的流行病减少,在全国八个行政区域(博科,科纳克里,法拉纳,坎坎,科迪亚,拉贝,马穆,以及马萨诸塞州)的多层次抽样程序中,恩泽雷科雷)。几乎所有参与者(92%)都意识到了埃博拉预防措施,但有27%的人认为埃博拉可以通过环境空气传播,49%的人认为可以通过避免蚊子叮咬来保护自己免受埃博拉病毒侵害。参与者中,95%的人表示采取行动避免获得埃博拉病毒,特别是频繁洗手(93%)。几乎所有的参与者(91%)都表示会派遣怀疑埃博拉病毒的亲戚到埃博拉治疗中心,89%的参与者表示将与埃博拉伊蚊子组织的工作人员一起从怀疑的埃博拉身上清除尸体。参与者中有66%表示,他们宁愿在安全距离的地方观察埃博拉病毒的尸体,而不是进行涉及尸体接触的传统葬礼仪式。调查结果用于指导目前正在进行的疫情应对和恢复工作,包括卫生沟通,社会动员和规划,以防止和应对未来的爆发或零星的埃博拉病例。
在埃塞维亚流行于2014-2015年期间,在塞拉利昂(4个),利比里亚(5个),尼日利亚(6个)和几内亚的一个地区(7个)进行埃博拉相关的KAP评估。为了进一步了解几内亚与埃博拉相关的KAP,由于艾滋病病毒教育和预防活动超过一年的艾滋病病毒流行病在全美流行病减退,一些组织于2015年8月对所有行政区域进行了埃博拉KAP评估。当时累积病例数量有所不同实际上在几内亚(森林几内亚,海洋几内亚,中几内亚和上几内亚)的四个自然区域(图);森林几内亚地区以前的强烈传播受到控制,但海运几内亚地区的传播仍然存在(8)。实施了各种控制措施,包括病例调查和接触追踪,关于预防措施的卫生沟通,以及专门治疗单位和埋葬小组,管理受埃博拉病毒影响的人员和尸体。
评估采用了使用多级群集抽样程序的横截面设计。 2014年几内亚计数地区人口普查清单作为随机选择所有八个行政区域的150个集群的抽样框架,由几内亚四个自然区域分组。在每个行政区域内,地区由两个层次进行随机抽样,这两个层次由高(≥95)或低(<95)累积计数的确定病例定义,在2015年5月之前报告给国家埃博拉监测系统。样本进一步分层包括城乡子项。随机抽取每个子班区,每个群体选择20个家庭,采用随机游走法进行系统随机抽样。?在每个选定的家庭中,进行了两次采访;*个是户主,第二个是随机选择的年龄≥25岁的女性,或15-24岁的性别。访问由本地培训的数据收集者使用免费的开源工具来管理移动数据收集,安装在移动设备上。使用统计软件分析数据。对于每个记录,通过应用参与者行政区域的人口规模的因子来计算参与者选择的可能性的加权估计值;为整体和区域数据产生了95%置信区间。
美国NovaBios
我司还提供其它进口或国产试剂盒:登革热、疟疾、乙脑、寨卡、黄热病、基孔肯雅热、克锥虫病、违禁品滥用、肺炎球菌、军团菌等试剂盒以及日本生研细菌分型诊断血清、德国SiFin诊断血清、丹麦SSI诊断血清等产品。
想了解更多的NovaBios产品及服务请扫描下方二维码:
【公司名称】 广州健仑生物科技有限公司
【市场部】 杨永汉
【】
【腾讯 】 2042552662
【公司地址】 广州清华科技园创新基地番禺石楼镇创启路63号二期2幢101-103室
To improve public awareness and social mobilization of knowledge, attitudes and practices (EAPA) for Ebola virus (Ebola virus) is essential for controlling the Ebola virus outbreak in Guinea in 2004 (1 ), Resulting in 3,814 cases of Ebola cases reported 2,544 deaths * Guinea Most of the Ebola virus is due to HIV infection with HIV and corpses washing and touching while at home, funerals and sanitation facilities without proper infection control prevention Measures (2,3). As a result of the 18-month increase in epidemics in August 18, the eight administrative regions in the country (Brocade, Conakry, Farana, Kankan, Kodia, Rabe, Mam, and Massachusetts) Level sampling program, Enze Recole). Almost all participants (92%) were aware of Ebola's precaution, but 27% thought that Ebola could spread through ambient air, and 49% thought it could protect themselves from Ebon by avoiding mosquito bite Pull virus damage. Among the participants, 95% said they took action to avoid getting Ebola virus, especially frequent hand washing (93%). Almost all of the participants (91%) said they would send relatives suspected of Ebola virus to Ebola treatment center, 89% of participants said they would work with Ebolai mosquito staff from suspected Eber Pull the body to remove the body. 66% of the participants said they would prefer to observe the body of the Ebola virus in a safe distance, rather than the traditional funeral rituals involving body contact. The findings are used to guide the ongoing ongoing epidemic response and recovery efforts, including health communication, social mobilization and planning to prevent and respond to future outbreaks or sporadic instances of Ebola.
Ebola-related KAP assessments were conducted during the 2014-2015 period in Sierra Leone (4), Liberia (5), Nigeria (6) and one region of Guinea (7). In order to further understand KAP related to Guinea and Ebola, HIV / AIDS epidemics in HIV / AIDS epidemics in the United States were more than one year due to HIV education and prevention activities. Some organizations conducted Ebola KAP in all administrative regions in August 2015 Evaluation. The number of cumulative cases at that time was actually different in four natural areas (Guinea) in Guinea (Guinea, Guinea, Guinea, Guinea and Guinea); the strong spread of forests in Guinea was under control, but the transmission of Guinea Exists (8). Various control measures have been implemented, including case visits and contact tracking, health communication on preventive measures, and specialized treatment units and burial groups to manage persons and corpses affected by Ebola virus.
The evaluation uses a cross-sectional design using a multi-level cluster sampling procedure. In 2014, Guinea counted the regional census list as a sampling framework for randomly selecting 150 clusters in all eight administrative regions, grouped by four natural regions of Guinea. In each administrative region, the area is randomly sampled at two levels, defined by high (≥95) or low (<95) cumulative counts, and reported to the country before May 2015 Pull monitoring system. The samples are further stratified to include urban and rural children. Randomly selected each sub-class area, each group selected 20 families, using random walk method for random sampling system. In each selected family, two interviews were conducted; the first was the head of the household, the second was randomly selected for women ≥ 25 years of age, or 15-24 years of age. Access to locally trained data collectors Use free open source tools to manage data collection and install on devices. Analyze the data using statistical software. For each record, a weighted estimate of the likelihood of participant selection is calculated by applying the population size factor of the participant's administrative area; a 95% confidence interval is generated for the overall and regional data.